Photoperiod Modulates Morphophysiological Characteristics and Yield of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) and Arugula (Eruca sativa L.) Microgreens Under Controlled Conditions

Indoor microgreen production systems are becoming increasingly popular because they can achieve high yields and quality, especially in unfavorable climates

José A. Sánchez-Villegas, Alberto SÁNCHEZ-ESTRADA, Jesús F. Ayala-Zavala, Alma R. Toledo-Guillén, Judith FORTIZ-HERNÁNDEZ, Jorge Nemesio Mercado-Ruíz

Horticulturae · 2026 · https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040439

Abstract

Indoor microgreen production systems are becoming increasingly popular because they can achieve high yields and quality, especially in unfavorable climates and urban settings. Light is a critical environmental factor that influences plant development; however, limited information exists on the effects of photoperiod (PP) on the growth of chia and arugula microgreens and on the associated electricity costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of different blue LED light (Light-Emitting-Diode) PPs, 24:0, 18:6, 12:12, and 6:18 h of light:dark compared with natural light, on the growth and biomass production of Salvia hispanica (chia) and Eruca sativa (arugula) grown indoors under controlled conditions (25 °C and 189.4 μmol·m−2·s−1). In chia, shoot length increased (p ≤ 0.05) with shorter PP, particularly under the 6:18 and 12:12 h·d−1 photoperiods, while arugula showed no significant response. Root length and total plant length were unaffected by photoperiod in either species. Leaf area was the most responsive growth parameter, with larger leaves produced under PP of 18 h or more per day. Total chlorophyll content was highest at 12:12 and 18:6 h light:dark. Fresh biomass reached its maximum at 18:6, with 637.6 g m−2 in chia and 883.7 g m−2 in arugula. TOPSIS was used as a multi-criteria decision-making tool for comprehensive treatment evaluation, showing that the 6:18 treatment achieved the highest overall ranking, whereas the 18:6 treatment resulted in the greatest biomass production.

Licence and reuse

LicenceCC-BY-4.0
May we host this PDF?Yes
May we publish a plain-language summary?Yes — this licence permits adaptations.
Commercial use permitted?Yes
Share-alike required?No

How to credit this work

José A. Sánchez-Villegas; Alberto SÁNCHEZ-ESTRADA; Jesús F. Ayala-Zavala; Alma R. Toledo-Guillén; Judith FORTIZ-HERNÁNDEZ; Jorge Nemesio Mercado-Ruíz (2026). Photoperiod Modulates Morphophysiological Characteristics and Yield of Chia (Salvia hispanica L.) and Arugula (Eruca sativa L.) Microgreens Under Controlled Conditions. Horticulturae. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae12040439 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Hosted by EVEC Athens (microgreens.org.gr). No changes were made to this article. Provided as-is, without warranties. EVEC Athens is not affiliated with, and this copy is not endorsed by, the authors or the publisher.

Explore this on our site

About this copy

This is a copy of the published article, hosted by EVEC Athens for free educational use under its open licence. The permanent scientific reference is the DOI above. We have not altered the file in any way. If you are an author or rights holder and want this copy removed, please use our notice and takedown procedure. We acknowledge every request within five working days, and act within ten.

Co-funded by the European Union.
This portal presents the microgreens methodology; the organisation behind it is EVEC Athens — the European Voluntary and Educational Center (evec.org.gr). Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Open licence. Except where stated otherwise, the educational materials on this portal are licensed under CC BY 4.0 — free to use, adapt and share, including commercially, with credit. See the licence terms.

Accessibility. We aim for WCAG 2.1 AA and publish what does and does not yet meet it — see the accessibility statement. If anything here blocks you, tell us and we will send the material in a format that works for you.