Four herbal microgreen species varied in optimal seeding densities and growing substrate for maximized shoot yield and mineral nutrients

The microgreen industry in North America has experienced continuous growth, with an increasing number of species, including vegetables, herbs, and grains,

Jacob D. Arthur, Tongyin Li, Guihong Bi, Shecoya White, Abby Pennington, Raju Bheemanahalli

Technology in Horticulture · 2025 · https://doi.org/10.48130/tihort-0025-0032

Abstract

The microgreen industry in North America has experienced continuous growth, with an increasing number of species, including vegetables, herbs, and grains, being produced as microgreens. Cultural practices significantly impact the productivity and nutrient composition of various microgreen species. The hypothesis of this study was that optimal cultural practices, including seeding density and substrate type in microgreen production, should be species dependent. This study investigated shoot growth, visual quality, and mineral nutrient compositions of four herbal microgreen species, including basil, chives, scallion, and shiso, in two experiments as affected by five seeding densities, including 75, 150, 225, 300, and 375 g·m<sup>−2</sup>, when grown with a peat-based soilless substrate, and a hydroponic mat made from jute fibers. Microgreen fresh shoot weights generally increased with increasing seeding density, with scallion producing the highest fresh shoot weight at 375 g·m<sup>−2</sup>, whereas the 375 g·m<sup>−2</sup> seeding density increased fresh shoot weight compared with 75 to 225 g·m<sup>−2</sup>, but resulted in similar fresh shoot yield to 300 g·m<sup>−2</sup> in basil, chives, and shiso. Scallion and shiso microgreens produced higher fresh shoot weight when grown on peat-based substrate, while basil and chives produced higher fresh shoot weight on jute mat compared with peat in one or both experiments. Substrate type also altered mineral nutrient concentrations in tested microgreens with peat substrate increasing phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and sulfur (S), and jute mat increasing nitrogen (N) and magnesium (Mg) in one or more species.

Licence and reuse

LicenceCC-BY-4.0
May we host this PDF?Yes
May we publish a plain-language summary?Yes — this licence permits adaptations.
Commercial use permitted?Yes
Share-alike required?No

How to credit this work

Jacob D. Arthur; Tongyin Li; Guihong Bi; Shecoya White; Abby Pennington; Raju Bheemanahalli (2025). Four herbal microgreen species varied in optimal seeding densities and growing substrate for maximized shoot yield and mineral nutrients. Technology in Horticulture. https://doi.org/10.48130/tihort-0025-0032 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Hosted by EVEC Athens (microgreens.org.gr). No changes were made to this article. Provided as-is, without warranties. EVEC Athens is not affiliated with, and this copy is not endorsed by, the authors or the publisher.

Explore this on our site

About this copy

This is a copy of the published article, hosted by EVEC Athens for free educational use under its open licence. The permanent scientific reference is the DOI above. We have not altered the file in any way. If you are an author or rights holder and want this copy removed, please use our notice and takedown procedure. We acknowledge every request within five working days, and act within ten.

Co-funded by the European Union.
This portal presents the microgreens methodology; the organisation behind it is EVEC Athens — the European Voluntary and Educational Center (evec.org.gr). Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Open licence. Except where stated otherwise, the educational materials on this portal are licensed under CC BY 4.0 — free to use, adapt and share, including commercially, with credit. See the licence terms.

Accessibility. We aim for WCAG 2.1 AA and publish what does and does not yet meet it — see the accessibility statement. If anything here blocks you, tell us and we will send the material in a format that works for you.