Get in touch
Questions about growing, workshops, the cooperative or partnerships? Send us a message and we will reply by email.
Prefer email? Write to erasmus@evec.org.gr

Which varieties are good sources of what, why we removed the daily gram amounts we used to publish, and practical ways to work microgreens into a training diet.
Nutritional density only counts if it reaches the plate. This second part of “Microgreens and Sports Performance” moves from the nutrient profile to daily use: which varieties are good sources of what, how much is realistic to eat, and how they fit into a complete nutritional strategy.
What the evidence supports, and what it does not. We could not find a single trial testing microgreens against any athletic outcome — not performance, not recovery, not body composition, not immunity. The research that exists measures what is in the plants, not what they do in a trained body. This article therefore describes microgreens as a nutrient-dense vegetable to build into an athlete’s diet, and nothing more. It is general nutrition education, not sports-nutrition prescription, and it is not medical advice.
In the first part, we looked at the nutrient profile of microgreens: their concentration of vitamins, antioxidant compounds, minerals and other bioactive compounds.
In this second part, we focus on how to actually get them into a training diet. They are small, but they are easy to add to meals you are already eating, which is usually the deciding factor in whether a food ends up in the rotation at all.
Different microgreens have different nutrient profiles, so rotating varieties is sensible. The descriptions below are about composition — what tends to be present in the plant. They are not claims that eating a given variety produces a given result in training. Exact amounts vary considerably with cultivar, growing conditions and harvest age.
For sports such as running, cycling, cross training, HIIT and football.
For strength training, weightlifting, calisthenics, powerlifting and combat sports.
There is no evidence-based intake for microgreens, for athletes or for anyone else. No dose-response study has been done, so any gram figure by training load would be invented.
This page previously carried a table of daily amounts scaled by training load — 20–30 g for general health, rising to 60–90 g for injury recovery. Those numbers had no source and we have removed them. We are not able to replace them with better numbers, because the studies that would produce them have not been done.
What can be said honestly: microgreens count towards your vegetable intake. Public health guidance is built around total fruit and vegetable intake — the World Health Organization recommends at least 400 g of fruit and vegetables per day for adults — not around any single crop. Treat microgreens as one contributor to that total, spread across meals or shakes according to taste and budget. An athlete with specific nutritional needs should work with a registered sports dietitian, not with a figure from a web page.
Suggested combination:
The oats and banana are the part carrying the carbohydrate here; the microgreens are for nutrients and flavour.
A straightforward protein-and-carbohydrate bowl, with the microgreens added raw at the end so they keep their texture.
Microgreens are easy to grow, easy to add to a meal, and nutrient-dense for their weight. That is a good enough reason to eat them. What we cannot tell you is that they will make you faster, stronger, or quicker to recover: nobody has run that study.
Areas researchers have flagged as worth investigating include effects on gut microbiota, extracts as supplement ingredients, and antioxidant status under heavy training loads. Those are open questions, not findings.
Sources
Balik, S., Elgudayem, F., Dasgan, H. Y., Kafkas, N. E., & Gruda, N. S. (2025). Nutritional quality profiles of six microgreens. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 6213. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39979322/ — a composition study. It measures nutrient content in the plants and does not test any athletic outcome.
Correction note: we removed the table of daily gram amounts by training load (20–30 g for general health up to 60–90 g for injury recovery). It had no source, and we have not replaced it, because no dose-response study exists. We also removed physiological claims we could not support — that radish “improves circulation and oxygenation”, that broccoli “supports cellular repair”, that cilantro “helps reduce heavy metals”, that amaranth “supports immune function and muscle regeneration”, that basil has “anti-inflammatory properties”, and the summary lines promising enhanced energy production, muscular oxygenation, protein synthesis, reduced post-training inflammation and improved body composition.
Sources dropped in the same pass: Singh, Lall & Sagar (2025) in the International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research, because that journal returns no records in PubMed and its publisher advertises publication within roughly one week of submission — we do not treat it as peer-reviewed evidence; and three commercial and consumer blogs (Skye Mountain, Microgreens World, Enriched Being) that were supporting health and performance claims. Under our editorial standards, grower blogs are citable for growing technique but not for health, nutritional or therapeutic claims.
This article is part of the free knowledge portal of EVEC Microgreens. Wherever you are on your microgreens journey, there is a path for you:
Co-funded by the European Union.
This portal presents the microgreens methodology; the organisation behind it is EVEC Athens — the European Voluntary and Educational Center (evec.org.gr). Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
Open licence. Except where stated otherwise, the educational materials on this portal are licensed under CC BY 4.0 — free to use, adapt and share, including commercially, with credit. See the licence terms.
Accessibility. We aim for WCAG 2.1 AA and publish what does and does not yet meet it — see the accessibility statement. If anything here blocks you, tell us and we will send the material in a format that works for you.